Because I go FEWER miles to get bio. I drive 100 miles (50 each way) to my bio retailer. That's usually when I'm doing errands in that direction anyway, so the true 'extra' milea are maybe 50. Say three times a year so between 150 and 300 miles on my car are spent getting fuel for the year. That does mean zero miles on my wife's car because I bring back her fuel to re-fill at home. How far is your preferred seller of fuel or additive? How many miles per year do you spend going there and back when you wouldn't usually?
like this?
After seeing inside dino diesel pumps, intakes, EGRs, turbos I swear I'll not use petrodiesel again. It's just too dirty with too much residue to be of long term use. Sure if your idea of a "lifetime" is just 100,000 miles D2 is probably OK, but I buy the worn out poor running D2 cars, clean 'em up, and then keep them clean on B99 and B100.
B99 pump price, road tax paid, is LESS than the prevailing D2 pump price here.
NOx is not to be discounted. It is a real issue. Some say it's higher, other studies show it to be lower, as the bio percent increases. Either way the amount of NOx is measured in PPM, whereas the amount of greenhouse gas from petrodiesel is measured in pounds per gallon, and there's no way around that fact. Claiming that a lower NOx justifies a thousandfold increase on other emissions is akin to claiming that because I re-cycle my coffee cup I can dump gallons of crank oil into drinking water supplies. Bio, depending on the source, can be just as detrimental to the environment as burning a fossil fuel, but from less destructive sources and production methods, can be greener than solar panel powered electric cars.
That acid/alkalai two step transesterification process, with methanol recovery, using locally sourced post-consumer waste is the production model my supplier uses. So if I come off as having a "greener-than-thou" attitude, I think it's justified.