We know a good mechanic that replaces MAFs all the time
and in most cases, the person was using a K & N filter.
He has a entire shelf covered with
K and N filters that
he has replaced with the stock type dry air filter.
He knows his busness, and he says that the K and Ns caused the MAF to fail.
Why run a
K and N in the first place? Do you really believe their false ads and statements?
Do you think that your stock air cleaner is not supplying enough air.
Can you feel more power?
Are you getting better fuel economy?
If you are honest with yourself, your answers to all of these questions must be a big '
no.'
I ran a dyno test on an SS I had. Once with a stock AC filter that
had 18k miles. It was far from new, and not really clean at all.
Because I was entitled to two 'pulls' I removed the old AC paper filter and we ran it again.
QUESS WHAT? There was no difference at all. Now just how much better can
a
K and N be as far as restriction is concerned than no filter at all?
I rest my case.
It is your money at all, and IF you want to throw it away and
have to replace those expensive MAFs, be my guest.
HTHs
it finally worked i got the pic to come throught
it finally worked i got the pic to come throught
