Re: Chapagne performance on a beer budget
WOW that's a big bump indeed! I noted to Brian earlier that my car feels very much more "elastic," and acceleration -- particular in-gear -- feels much snappier and an order of magnitude more EFFORTLESS. Less go-pedal needed for more go
If it's any indication, clutch slippage after the mod is VERY evident
, even from
3rd gear (!!) from around 1800 rpm. Previously it would only slip in 5th and maybe 4th on a good day (post Upsolute).
Unfortunately, smoke is also pretty evident, too. Brian notes his car has almost NO visible smoke. Someone pointed out earlier that the optimum resistance values vary from car to car. Here's a text book case.
I believe my car in its regular state of tune is already close to the rich limit in terms of fueling, which may partially explain why my car feels stronger than GoFaster's (Brian, does this render your username invalid?
).
On the plus side, however, my car apparently still gets better fuel mileage than GoFaster's
And like him, I don't have any discernable out-of-the-ordinary driveability issues.
Nobody's going to pry this gem of a car out of my hands... OVER MY DEAD BODY!
Now we need to find an official name for this mod. I vote for "Poor Man's Tuning Box" although the results are hardly poor...
------------------
TDIMeister
05/97 Silber B4 Passat
T<font color="red">DI</font>
Airbox "mods", K&N, Upsolute chip, turbo boost bleed, "Champagne" mod a.k.a. Poor Man's Tuning Box
, 20% tint all-around.
[This message has been edited by tdimeister (edited February 26, 2001).]