Are Cold Air Intakes Worth it?

buyingconstant7

Veteran Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Location
Calgary, Alberta
TDI
2006 Jetta TDI 5spd
I read an article by AFE that their intake for 2009-2014 Jetta's and Golf TDI's improve power by 10 horsepower and torque at over 23 ft/lbs. And fuel economy goes up by 1 to 2 mpg. Is dropping $300 for one, worth it?
 

turbobrick240

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Nov 18, 2014
Location
maine
TDI
2011 vw golf tdi(gone to greener pastures), 2001 ford f250 powerstroke
Those numbers are marketing bs. You will gain nothing but better looks (subjectively)and more whooshing sound.
 
Last edited:

n1das

TDIClub Enthusiast, Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2002
Location
Nashua, NH, USA
TDI
2014 BMW 535xd ///M-Sport, 2012 BMW X5 Xdrive35d, former 3x TDI owner
At 23 feet per pounds (ft/lbs) it will be way too large to fit under the hood unless it weighs next to nothing.

It's all marketing BS. The car already has a well designed CAI system that came from the factory. Any aftermarket CAI setup is a WAI in reality. I recommend saving your money for mods that will give a tangible payback such a quality tune in the ECU.

If you have any doubts, do some back to back dyno runs on the same dyno on the same day where the intake change is the only change made between dyno runs.

Good luck.


Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
 

JETaah

Vendor , w/Business number
Joined
Jan 18, 2001
Location
mi 48836
TDI
96 B4V, 2005 BEW Beetle, 2005 Jetta Wagon
Isn't the car getting the air from outside the engine compartment anyway?
 

gatz

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2005
Location
Windsor, CT
TDI
2005 Mk4 Golf TDI PD, 2006 MkV Golf GTI
Stainless Steel Pedal Kit
Nothing wrong with cosmetic upgrades if that's what floats your boat! Although in the case of the intake, I think you may actually be making it worse with most of those kits.
 

PGM jetta

Veteran Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Location
Northern Alabama
TDI
05 Jetta BEW
Nothing wrong with cosmetic upgrades if that's what floats your boat! Although in the case of the intake, I think you may actually be making it worse with most of those kits.
Nothing wrong at all with cosmetic mods. But don't install SS pedals or a CAI and expect 12 hp, 45 ft-lbs, and/or a 7mpg increase. Also, the only number increase from a CAI is how soon you'll be replacing your MAF sensor
 
Last edited:

Perfectreign

Veteran Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2013
Location
Los Angeles
TDI
2000 Jetta GLS 5-speed
You know, CAI's are awesome. If you install one of those, especially with an oil mesh air filter, you'll be starting right.
Add some "powered by VW" and "funkengruven" stickers, a few fire flames on the side, and a spoiler and you'll be even better.




Pretty soon, however, you're looking at wanting more than a CAI and may add a jet engine.

Just sayin'
 

n1das

TDIClub Enthusiast, Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2002
Location
Nashua, NH, USA
TDI
2014 BMW 535xd ///M-Sport, 2012 BMW X5 Xdrive35d, former 3x TDI owner
The SS pedals are just as likely to gain you 12hp, 45 ft/lbs and a 7mpg increase as would a cold air system. :D :p
Feet per pounds (ft/lbs), i.e., feet divided by pounds?? :confused:
 

n1das

TDIClub Enthusiast, Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2002
Location
Nashua, NH, USA
TDI
2014 BMW 535xd ///M-Sport, 2012 BMW X5 Xdrive35d, former 3x TDI owner
People aren't likely to see any increase in hp and torque* with an aftermarket CAI because the car already has a well designed CAI setup that was installed at the FACTORY. Aftermarket CAIs generally are WAIs in reality compared to an OEM CAI setup. The OEM CAI and airbox setup is not restrictive at all and the ECU controls the turbo in a closed loop which means the ECU ensures the engine gets the amount of air the ECU wants it to get. The OEM CAI and airbox setup is not where any sort of restriction is so opening this area up further yields no improvement.

Spend the money on a quality ECU tune for more hp, torque and MPGs.

Good luck.

* The units of torque are in ft-lbs (feet times pounds), lb-ft (pounds times feet), or Nm (Newton times meters). Torque is NOT in feet per pounds (ft/lbs) or pounds per foot (lb/ft). While feet per pounds (ft/lbs) and pounds per foot (lb/ft) are valid units, they are NOT the units of torque at all (totally wrong!) and each describe something physically different from torque.
 
Last edited:

n1das

TDIClub Enthusiast, Veteran Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2002
Location
Nashua, NH, USA
TDI
2014 BMW 535xd ///M-Sport, 2012 BMW X5 Xdrive35d, former 3x TDI owner
:eek: Oops... Yeah, screwed the pooch on that one. Torque is expressed as Foot-lbs (or Lb-Feet, or newton-meters, across the pond)
Thanks for keeping me "honest". ;)
frank
LOL. :) I was also responding earlier to what the OP wrote (23 feet per pounds (ft/lbs), i.e., 23 feet divided by pounds). It's a multiplication, not a division. It makes a BIG difference! :)

Put that $300 towards a tune. Then you'll have your hp, torque, and mpg
What PGM jetta said. :cool:
 
Last edited:

buyingconstant7

Veteran Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Location
Calgary, Alberta
TDI
2006 Jetta TDI 5spd
Stainless Steel Pedal Kit

Hehe... that made me LOL
Hey, I like my stainless steel pedals! They came with the car when I bought it, so I had no choice, but I'm gonna leave them on, it sharpens up the footwell area, LOL. Definitely not worth the $250 VW wants for the kit though...
 

fouillard13

Veteran Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Location
Pincher Creek, AB
TDI
03 Jetta TDI Standard
“ft-lb,” “lb-ft,” or “foot-pound is the proper terminology?

makes it look like ft minus lb if you wanna get technical!

lb·ft?

ft·lb?
 

turbobrick240

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Nov 18, 2014
Location
maine
TDI
2011 vw golf tdi(gone to greener pastures), 2001 ford f250 powerstroke
It's lb-ft, lb/ft, or pound foot, but everybody knows what is meant when it's written otherwise. If one wants to be annoyingly technical about it the lb-ft is a measure of turning force (like the newton meter), and ft-lb is a measure of work (like kilowatt hour, and joule). Confusingly, newton meter can refer to two different units that measure either turning force or work. But in the context of our cars, it's a measure of torque.
 
Last edited:

buyingconstant7

Veteran Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2014
Location
Calgary, Alberta
TDI
2006 Jetta TDI 5spd
Better performance 2009-2014 tdi ???
Is that with emission equip on or off ????
Yeah that's with the stuff on it. I can see it improving if the stuff is off, since everything flows much more free, but with it being laden down, I'm not so sure. Sounds like I should prioritize mods that will make a difference, before the CAI
 

KLXD

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Location
Lompoc, CA
TDI
'98, '2 Jettas
In the 11 years it took me to finish 4 years of Engineering torque was never referred to as lb-ft.

Never new that lb-ft was the "correct" :rolleyes: term for torque until the magazines started using it maybe 10 - 15 years ago.
 

JSWTDI09

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
TDI
2009 JSW TDI (gone but not forgotten)
CAIs can make a noticeable difference in a normally aspirated engine. Our cars are turbocharged and the turbo is quite capable of delivering all of the air needed for our engines. An "improved" air intake is only required after you have done major upgrades to your turbocharger and exhaust systems. It is not the place to start unless your primary objective is to lose weight in your wallet (and make somebody else more money).

Have Fun!

Don
 

turbobrick240

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Nov 18, 2014
Location
maine
TDI
2011 vw golf tdi(gone to greener pastures), 2001 ford f250 powerstroke
In the 11 years it took me to finish 4 years of Engineering torque was never referred to as lb-ft.

Never new that lb-ft was the "correct" :rolleyes: term for torque until the magazines started using it maybe 10 - 15 years ago.
Yeah, lb-ft and ft-lb are pretty much used interchangeably as a measure of torque. No sense in nitpicking. And when expressed as lb-ft, ft-lb, ft/lb, or lb/ft, the - and / are grammatical not mathematical symbols.
 

fxk

Veteran Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2015
Location
Vast wilderness between DC and Baltimore
TDI
2014 Sportwagen TDI
CAIs can make a noticeable difference in a normally aspirated engine. Our cars are turbocharged and the turbo is quite capable of delivering all of the air needed for our engines. An "improved" air intake is only required after you have done major upgrades to your turbocharger and exhaust systems. It is not the place to start unless your primary objective is to lose weight in your wallet (and make somebody else more money).

Have Fun!

Don
The "noticeable difference" in normally aspirated cars is the drone of the intake roar. More noise creates the illusion of going fast. Normally aspirated engines are not starving for airflow. I think SS pedals are appropriate here, too.

An old Rambler a friend of mine had made plenty of noise from the intake. You could hear every little throttle position change as we drove.

The first time I rode a Harley, I was taken back by the amount of intake roar, and how that roar was a BIG part of "The Harley Sound".

IMNTBHO, intake roar is not desirable - it is neither musical nor interesting in its boring sameness. Fatiguing, really.

frank
 

1854sailor

Resident Curmudgeon
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Location
Westerly, RI
TDI
2015 Golf SE SportWagen, 2015 Golf SE Hatch Back.
...intake roar is not desirable - it is neither musical nor interesting in its boring sameness. Fatiguing, really.
frank
Not musical? I take it that you've never heard a Ferrari Formula 1 V12 then?
 

belome

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Location
Mid MI
TDI
2002 Jetta GLS TDI 5-speed
I always chuckle at the people that run straight pipes, want more turbo whine etc...

Maybe if it isn't your daily driver and you are actually are modded to high heaven, but for me and my 135 mile a day commute, I'd rather not increase the volume a damn thing coming from my car.... well, except for the radio.
 

1854sailor

Resident Curmudgeon
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Location
Westerly, RI
TDI
2015 Golf SE SportWagen, 2015 Golf SE Hatch Back.
I put one of Buzz Ken's 2½" turbo back systems on the Golf when the original finally fell apart a couple of years ago. I kept a cat to stay legal and went with one resonator. There is no noticeable difference in interior noise.
 

turbovan+tdi

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Mar 23, 2014
Location
Abbotsford, BC.
TDI
2003 TDI 2.0L ALH, auto, silver wagon, lowered, Colt stage 2 cam, ported head,205 injectors, 1756 turbo, Malone 2.0, 3" exhaust, 18" BBS RC GLI rims. 2004 blue GSW TDI, 5 speed, lowered, GLI BBS wheels painted black, Malone stage 2, Aerotur
What's the deal with you guys, having a fight over ft/lbs? Not enough action at home? :rolleyes: :eek:
 
Top