buyingconstant7
Veteran Member
I read an article by AFE that their intake for 2009-2014 Jetta's and Golf TDI's improve power by 10 horsepower and torque at over 23 ft/lbs. And fuel economy goes up by 1 to 2 mpg. Is dropping $300 for one, worth it?
Nothing wrong with cosmetic upgrades if that's what floats your boat! Although in the case of the intake, I think you may actually be making it worse with most of those kits.Stainless Steel Pedal Kit
Nothing wrong at all with cosmetic mods. But don't install SS pedals or a CAI and expect 12 hp, 45 ft-lbs, and/or a 7mpg increase. Also, the only number increase from a CAI is how soon you'll be replacing your MAF sensorNothing wrong with cosmetic upgrades if that's what floats your boat! Although in the case of the intake, I think you may actually be making it worse with most of those kits.
Feet per pounds (ft/lbs), i.e., feet divided by pounds??The SS pedals are just as likely to gain you 12hp, 45 ft/lbs and a 7mpg increase as would a cold air system.
Oops... Yeah, screwed the pooch on that one. Torque is expressed as Foot-lbs (or Lb-Feet, or newton-meters, across the pond)Feet per pounds (ft/lbs), i.e., feet divided by pounds??
LOL. I was also responding earlier to what the OP wrote (23 feet per pounds (ft/lbs), i.e., 23 feet divided by pounds). It's a multiplication, not a division. It makes a BIG difference!Oops... Yeah, screwed the pooch on that one. Torque is expressed as Foot-lbs (or Lb-Feet, or newton-meters, across the pond)
Thanks for keeping me "honest".
frank
What PGM jetta said.Put that $300 towards a tune. Then you'll have your hp, torque, and mpg
Hey, I like my stainless steel pedals! They came with the car when I bought it, so I had no choice, but I'm gonna leave them on, it sharpens up the footwell area, LOL. Definitely not worth the $250 VW wants for the kit though...Stainless Steel Pedal Kit
Hehe... that made me LOL
Better performance 2009-2014 tdi ???I read an article by AFE that their intake for 2009-2014 Jetta's and Golf TDI's improve power by 10 horsepower and torque at over 23 ft/lbs. And fuel economy goes up by 1 to 2 mpg. Is dropping $300 for one, worth it?
Yeah that's with the stuff on it. I can see it improving if the stuff is off, since everything flows much more free, but with it being laden down, I'm not so sure. Sounds like I should prioritize mods that will make a difference, before the CAIBetter performance 2009-2014 tdi ???
Is that with emission equip on or off ????
Yeah, lb-ft and ft-lb are pretty much used interchangeably as a measure of torque. No sense in nitpicking. And when expressed as lb-ft, ft-lb, ft/lb, or lb/ft, the - and / are grammatical not mathematical symbols.In the 11 years it took me to finish 4 years of Engineering torque was never referred to as lb-ft.
Never new that lb-ft was the "correct" term for torque until the magazines started using it maybe 10 - 15 years ago.
The "noticeable difference" in normally aspirated cars is the drone of the intake roar. More noise creates the illusion of going fast. Normally aspirated engines are not starving for airflow. I think SS pedals are appropriate here, too.CAIs can make a noticeable difference in a normally aspirated engine. Our cars are turbocharged and the turbo is quite capable of delivering all of the air needed for our engines. An "improved" air intake is only required after you have done major upgrades to your turbocharger and exhaust systems. It is not the place to start unless your primary objective is to lose weight in your wallet (and make somebody else more money).
Have Fun!
Don
Not musical? I take it that you've never heard a Ferrari Formula 1 V12 then?...intake roar is not desirable - it is neither musical nor interesting in its boring sameness. Fatiguing, really.
frank