bi1b0
Member
Short summary: Is a 2.5 yrs old car with 2.0 TDI-PD (VW's "BMM") engine reasonable second-hand buy at 100,000 mi?
Hello guys,
The car in question is a second-hand Skoda Octavia Scout. The Scout, which has been on the market since 2007, uses VW's "BMM" engine -- the 140 PS two liter TDI-PD with 8 valves, which superseded the "AZV" and "BKD" TDI engines in the Octavia range. The typical Scout at 30,000 to 50,000 miles has always been above my budget, but for this one the asking price is $7000 lower. However, it also has 100,000 miles behind it, accumulated over two and a half years. So, no free lunch.
Many people are instantly put off by such high mileage. When I asked the same question on briskoda.net, quite a few people suggested to "stay away". Others, however, confirmed what I knew from my modest experience with engines: provided that the car has been well cared for, 100,000 miles should not be a deterrent.
Indeed, I've seen here on the forum quite a few people with 200,000+ miles on their cars and still running fine. What worries me, though, is that each new generation of engines seems to get more and more fragile (or less and less sturdy, if you prefer), which is not a surprise, considering the increased complexity and higher loads. While diesel engines had typically been well over-engineered in the past, I'm not sure if that's still that much true today.
To make things worse, the 2.0 TDI-PDs (at least the 140 PS ones) has so far proved to be not the most reliable in the VW's range, from all I've read. And the BMM, in particular, is still rather new, too. Finally, of course, it's not just the engine that is affected by the miles driven.
I realize that it's difficult to answer because there's so much difference between one car and another and even more so between two different owners and the way they've used their cars. So, I'm rather asking whether it's reasonable in general to buy a second-hand car (with a modern TDI) at that many miles, and expect it to run more or less smoothly -- obviously needing more attention and repairs compared to a new one, but certainly not spending more time in the garage than on the road.
I'll appreciate your comments and advice very much. Thanks!
Cheers,
Luchesar, a.k.a. Bilbo
P.S. It's probably helpful to know that the car has been driven in Germany, likely having spent most of its time on the German autobahns.
Hello guys,
The car in question is a second-hand Skoda Octavia Scout. The Scout, which has been on the market since 2007, uses VW's "BMM" engine -- the 140 PS two liter TDI-PD with 8 valves, which superseded the "AZV" and "BKD" TDI engines in the Octavia range. The typical Scout at 30,000 to 50,000 miles has always been above my budget, but for this one the asking price is $7000 lower. However, it also has 100,000 miles behind it, accumulated over two and a half years. So, no free lunch.
Many people are instantly put off by such high mileage. When I asked the same question on briskoda.net, quite a few people suggested to "stay away". Others, however, confirmed what I knew from my modest experience with engines: provided that the car has been well cared for, 100,000 miles should not be a deterrent.
Indeed, I've seen here on the forum quite a few people with 200,000+ miles on their cars and still running fine. What worries me, though, is that each new generation of engines seems to get more and more fragile (or less and less sturdy, if you prefer), which is not a surprise, considering the increased complexity and higher loads. While diesel engines had typically been well over-engineered in the past, I'm not sure if that's still that much true today.
To make things worse, the 2.0 TDI-PDs (at least the 140 PS ones) has so far proved to be not the most reliable in the VW's range, from all I've read. And the BMM, in particular, is still rather new, too. Finally, of course, it's not just the engine that is affected by the miles driven.
I realize that it's difficult to answer because there's so much difference between one car and another and even more so between two different owners and the way they've used their cars. So, I'm rather asking whether it's reasonable in general to buy a second-hand car (with a modern TDI) at that many miles, and expect it to run more or less smoothly -- obviously needing more attention and repairs compared to a new one, but certainly not spending more time in the garage than on the road.
I'll appreciate your comments and advice very much. Thanks!
Cheers,
Luchesar, a.k.a. Bilbo
P.S. It's probably helpful to know that the car has been driven in Germany, likely having spent most of its time on the German autobahns.