SkeeterMark
Veteran Member
Howso?Yet another confused anti-stripper.
And I explained clearly above I have nothing against strippers. They are just trying to pay for college
Howso?Yet another confused anti-stripper.
not so much. I'm all for stripping these cars, but if you remove something that positively affected your buyback value calculation, thats where I draw the line. whether or not VW agrees at the time of turn-in would be up to themYou are confusing the method of buyback calculation with the turn-in condition.
I think it depends on the purpose behind including those options in the calculator. If it was to ensure that you truly got a buyback value representative of what you paid, then it doesn't matter whether they're physically present at the time of the buyback or not. If it was because they're looking at the buyback like a trade-in, then it does. IMO it seems clear that the former is the case, given that damage isn't taken into account.not so much. I'm all for stripping these cars, but if you remove something that positively affected your buyback value calculation, thats where I draw the line. whether or not VW agrees at the time of turn-in would be up to them
The condition and equipment when purchased as new are what matter, not the condition and equipment at time of turn in. The only thing that matters at time of turn in is that it runs under the power of the 2.0 TDI engine.
No, to the contrary, the VW lawyer will argue this is a grossly abusive interpretation of the consent order provisions. And when the judge asks the class action lawyers if they are in agreement, all they need to say is "yes".They won't have much choice if the judge calls a new session for clarification, will they?
It really matters what we think about the situation. If VW doesn't want to accept the car or not is the issue. I hope they don't because the story will be much funnier that way. But none of us have any sway over whether the Buy Back Specialist accepts it or not.Yet another confused anti-stripper.
A Ford Lincoln Mercury Sable? A personal conveyance named after its inventor, an assassinated ruler, a character from Greco-Roman myth and a small fur-covered mammal.Haha. That Golf R front fascia sure does look sharp. I will reserve judgement on the rightness or wrongness of part stripping until we get news of a fix approval or rejection. As Dan Akroyd would say: 'Consume mass quantities'. And 'Take my car- it's reinforced alloy superstructure is far superior to that of your broken down, rusted out sh** box.'
That's one powerful crystal ball you have, seeing the future that isn't even necessarily going to happen and all...No, to the contrary, the VW lawyer will argue this is a grossly abusive interpretation of the consent order provisions. And when the judge asks the class action lawyers if they are in agreement, all they need to say is "yes".
When my species come to rule this planet, you will be on the protected rolls, and no harm will come to you. Narfle the Garthok!A Ford Lincoln Mercury Sable? A personal conveyance named after its inventor, an assassinated ruler, a character from Greco-Roman myth and a small fur-covered mammal.
The pre SCR cars would be a ridiculous amount of money to fix. You would end up with half a trunk or no passenger seat to fit a DEF tank
Yeah, they've really demonstrated that they care to be perceived as doing the right thing, what with the "massive delays with no information provided" thing.I think they may actually see PR upside to allowing the stripped cars to come in uncontested. It's a funny way for people to know that VW is doing the right thing.
Yeah, they've really demonstrated that they care to be perceived as doing the right thing, what with the "massive delays with no information provided" thing.
Back in your hole, troll.It really helps if you upload the correct documents; can get the whole thing wrapped up in a couple of weeks.
My friend, it was YOUR assumption that the matter would go to some form of hearing, and it was YOUR conjecture that the class action lawyers would have no choice but to support this overboard stripper.That's one powerful crystal ball you have, seeing the future that isn't even necessarily going to happen and all...
We do not know, in any way whatsoever:
1. What the buyback specialist will do
2. What VW might do depending on the above
3. What the judge might do depending on the above
4. What the lawyers might do depending on the above
Or in other words; that's one huge pile of assumptions you just made...
What we do know:
1. Buy back condition is specified as "driveable under 2.0l TDI power" That's it. 0 other conditions apply.
Everything else in your mind is conjecture.
Back in your hole, troll.
Sure, if you don't have a loan and are incredibly lucky. Otherwise you're going to be waiting a long time. Uploading the documents correctly the first time is a non sequitur.Hey, with all the complaining about wait times, some people on the forum might not know that the buyback can actually be done quite quickly.
My friend, it was YOUR assumption that the matter would go to some form of hearing, and it was YOUR conjecture that the class action lawyers would have no choice but to support this overboard stripper.
I was only responding to what would be more likely to happen in YOUR hypothetical world.
Sure, if you don't have a loan and are incredibly lucky. Otherwise you're going to be waiting a long time. Uploading the documents correctly the first time is a non sequitur.