Volkswagen says US pickup is back on the table

tdi90hp

Veteran Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2002
Location
Canuckland
TDI
2011 Golf TDI 6 speed(gone but NEVER forgotten)
Full size wants the V6 TDI like in the TOUAREG.
maybe so but next GEN silverado is LOSING 500pds. Next Gen 2.0 liter will gain (hopefully) at least 30HP and more torque. the torque will be close to my CURRENT 5.3liter V8. so let's assume they can get it down to low 4000pds....that is only 1000 pds more than my Golf. I think there is a HUGE market for work trucks and basic trucks with the 2.0 liter. No it wont beat the Denali at the lights but I would be willing it would be very adequate and give great highway mileage and good torque for pulling, towing...etc....
 

dubStrom

Veteran Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Location
Kansas City Missouri
TDI
2003 A4 Jetta (sold), 2010 JSW (sold), 2013 Passat 6MT traded for 2014 JSW with 6MT-TOTALED in November 2016, 2003 ALH 5MT conversion (sold), wheezing 2015 GSW/DSG and a new 2021 Tacoma Access Cab 4x4 p'up
Did you see the forward facing cam belt (longitudinal engine mount) in that engine photo? Easy access for timing belt changes (Yay!). It is SOOO tight in the jettas and golfs!

Engine work in my Toyota pickup (22R) is luxurious compared to doing surgery on the transverse mounted TDI!
 
Last edited:

blaz

Veteran Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2006
Location
Ontario Canada
TDI
05 Passat
maybe so but next GEN silverado is LOSING 500pds. Next Gen 2.0 liter will gain (hopefully) at least 30HP and more torque. the torque will be close to my CURRENT 5.3liter V8. so let's assume they can get it down to low 4000pds....that is only 1000 pds more than my Golf. I think there is a HUGE market for work trucks and basic trucks with the 2.0 liter. No it wont beat the Denali at the lights but I would be willing it would be very adequate and give great highway mileage and good torque for pulling, towing...etc....
Well they do sell a lot of full size pickups with V6 gas engines, so I guess there's a market for a big truck with a wimpy engine.

But for me, the whole point of a full size pickup is to haul/tow lots of weight. And you need lots of low end torque for that. I'm talking commercial and heavy recreational towing applications.

The 2012 Amorak I4 2L BiTDI puts out an amazing 310(ft-#)@1500-2000(rpm), as good or better than your V8 in that rpm range I think. But there are people who need even more for big loads and want a full-size pickup with the low end grunt to do it.

If the Toureg's V6 3L TDI were tuned more for low end torque and tow/haul applications, it should easily match and improve on my F150 3.5L Bi-Turbo Ecoboost's low end torque (~370@1500 upto ~420@3000), and do it on a lot less fuel.

But of course I'm dreaming. We can't even get the VW Amorak with the 2L I4 BiTDI here, much less a full size VW pickup.
 

tdi90hp

Veteran Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2002
Location
Canuckland
TDI
2011 Golf TDI 6 speed(gone but NEVER forgotten)
maybe VW is listening? if VW wants to sell 800K vehicles in NA they HAVE to bring a truck.....all over canada and USA you see 150s, Rams and Silverados. Do the VW excutives have their eyes closed when they visit NA?? Why could they not build them in NA ?? it's a new world....nothing should be off the table.
 

blaz

Veteran Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2006
Location
Ontario Canada
TDI
05 Passat
maybe VW is listening? if VW wants to sell 800K vehicles in NA they HAVE to bring a truck.....all over canada and USA you see 150s, Rams and Silverados. Do the VW excutives have their eyes closed when they visit NA?? Why could they not build them in NA ?? it's a new world....nothing should be off the table.
So true.
IIRC full-size pickups are the top selling vehicles in the U.S. and Canada, and have been for many years.
 

whiplash willy

Veteran Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2011
Location
Portland Oregon
TDI
2012 4-Door Golf TDI 6MT w/NAV & Sunroof
I am so sick of not having the same choice/options in vehicles as other countries all over the world have!

A quad cab Amarok 2.0 TDI Manual would be the perfect vehicle for me, but the only way I will ever be able to get one would be to move out of the country.

It pisses me off to no end that even US auto manufactures produce great vehicles with small efficient diesel engines, then don't offer them to the US.....

The new Ford Ranger for example:

2.2L Duratorq Turbo Diesel (265 Torque 33mpg)

I would love to be able to buy this as well.....but the idiots at Ford think it will bleed into the Ford F150 segment, where the most efficient version of the F150 (Ecoboost) only gets 16 city/ 22 highway/18 combined mpg!

Why does the rest of the world, and even our own, think we all are only interested in big bloated powerful inefficient vehicles? I blame Nascar....Get 'Er Done!
 
Last edited:

That Guy

Veteran Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
TDI
2001 MKiv Golf TDI
I am so sick of not having the same choice/options in vehicles as other countries all over the world have!

A quad cab Amarok 2.0 TDI Manual would be the perfect vehicle for me, but the only way I will ever be able to get one would be to move out of the country.

It pisses me off to no end that even US auto manufactures produce great vehicles with small efficient diesel engines, then don't offer them to the US.....
Hey...we're suffering here in Canada too. :)

Our line-up is almost always identical to yours in the states. .... Except for that time when you got the R32's, and we didn't.

Heck...it's even a pain to buy cars from the US. No one makes it easy for us to buy cars from across the border. So much for "free trade".

I sometimes like to torture myself by going to car sites in europe...sigh.;)
 

kjclow

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Location
Charlotte, NC
TDI
2010 JSW TDI silver and black. 2017 Ram Ecodiesel dark red with brown and beige interior.
At this point in my life, I no longer need the quad cab but really like the extended cab. Give me a little longer bed for the kayaks and bikes.
 

dubStrom

Veteran Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Location
Kansas City Missouri
TDI
2003 A4 Jetta (sold), 2010 JSW (sold), 2013 Passat 6MT traded for 2014 JSW with 6MT-TOTALED in November 2016, 2003 ALH 5MT conversion (sold), wheezing 2015 GSW/DSG and a new 2021 Tacoma Access Cab 4x4 p'up
really done with this crap

(Explitive deleted)

How many years has it been since US market has had a small (4 cylinder) diesel 4x4 option? I think it goes back to the 80's, but those are ALL rusted and junked (or just plain not for sale).

VW could sell me an Amarok tomorrow (today ....."HELLOOOO!!!"), but not happnin'


So... Build your own-

Remember those awesome SR5 4WD pickups from the 80's? Nice primitive and tough trucks with solid differential on front and back? Remember those? Fun to drive, dependable like sugar, tough like nails? Yup...them. The transmissions bolt right up to the Toyota L series diesel engines. And Oh, by the way, not even a third of the cost of the Amarok (admittedly. less features)... but, Here's the recipient:



Can you say "saguaro" (Sah-Gwa-Do!) Dry, no salt, no rust. Just a little sunburn. Not as shiny as the new cars above, and no turbo. But it will climb like a goat and get 35mpg.



And here is the donor:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2WjqMEvC98&list=UU0chjaAZHfH0pAaFC_Wz_lw&index=3&feature=plcp

The heck with the auto industry and entrenched USA import policy. Build what you want. The stuff is out there. Make a statement. In life, you can do what you want to. And you will. Choose wisely. Wait for something that may take years if it happens at all, or grab the reins. And enjoy.
 
Last edited:

blaz

Veteran Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2006
Location
Ontario Canada
TDI
05 Passat
Remember those awesome SR5 4WD pickups from the 80's? Nice primitive and tough trucks with solid differential on front and back? Remember those?
Saw one in the Everglades, FL a couple of months back. Guy said a lot of the repair parts come from rusted out ones up in Canada.
 

kjclow

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Location
Charlotte, NC
TDI
2010 JSW TDI silver and black. 2017 Ram Ecodiesel dark red with brown and beige interior.
Well they do sell a lot of full size pickups with V6 gas engines, so I guess there's a market for a big truck with a wimpy engine.
I'm not sure what qualifies as "a lot" but Dodge does not offer a V-6. Chevy only offers it in their base work truck that some dealers won't sell unless you need it for your trade. Ford offers 2 V-6s but they don't really get any better mileage than their smaller V-8. I know Ford is pushing the ECO-6 but from the people I know who have them, they say the difference in mileage will never make up for the difference in sticker price.
 

atc98002

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Location
Auburn WA
TDI
2014 Passat TDI SEL Premium (sold back), 2009 Jetta (sold back), 80 Rabbit diesel (long gone)
I'm not sure what qualifies as "a lot" but Dodge does not offer a V-6. Chevy only offers it in their base work truck that some dealers won't sell unless you need it for your trade. Ford offers 2 V-6s but they don't really get any better mileage than their smaller V-8. I know Ford is pushing the ECO-6 but from the people I know who have them, they say the difference in mileage will never make up for the difference in sticker price.
That surprised me that Dodge doesn't have the V6 any longer, but it figures. The V6 in my 2005 1500 doesn't have a lot of power, and doesn't do particularly well in economy either. I haven't seen better than 17mpg, and I see their small V8 is rated at 20. Why not have a more powerful engine if it burns less gas as well?

That said, I'd still prefer the Amarok TDI.
 

greengeeker

Vendor
Joined
Feb 8, 2006
Location
Cambridge, MN
TDI
2002 Jetta GLS
they say the difference in mileage will never make up for the difference in sticker price.
If one drives 20k a year, it will take 6.5 years to recover the $2400 premium over the 5.0L.

If you change trim, the payback is different. For instance the above numbers are for an XLT trim, if you go with a higher trim FX4 the premium is ~$1000 making the payback much shorter.

Anyway you spin it I'd rather have a TDI Amarok.
 
Last edited:

blaz

Veteran Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2006
Location
Ontario Canada
TDI
05 Passat
Ford offers 2 V-6s but they don't really get any better mileage than their smaller V-8. I know Ford is pushing the ECO-6 but from the people I know who have them, they say the difference in mileage will never make up for the difference in sticker price.
If one drives 20k a year, it will take 6.5 years to recover the $2400 premium over the 5.0L.
If you change trim, the payback is different. For instance the above numbers are for an XLT trim, if you go with a higher trim FX4 the premium is ~$1000 making the payback much shorter.
Yes, the Ecoboost was a $1K upgrade in my 2011 F150 FX2.
People buy the F150's 3.5L V6 Ecoboost BiTurbo primarily for the low end torque which is quite a bit better than Ford's 5L V8. It's the F150's tow/haul engine, and is close as you can get to a diesel with similar low-end torque in a full size pick-up.
The mpg is respectable, but not as good as a diesel with equivalent low-end torque would be. But then, an equivalent diesel would probably be ~3-4K more expensive (Toaureg TDI for example). Which could take even longer to pay back.
 

TDIMeister

Phd of TDIClub Enthusiast, Moderator at Large
Joined
May 1, 1999
Location
Canada
TDI
TDI
For applications that are called to operate under predominantly high-load such as heavy towing, the Ecoboost, indeed any gasoline engine, will not show a big improvement over a conventional gasoline engine. One reason is that downsizing, as is what Ecoboost is in concept, benefits primarily light load operation. The second is that while operating at full load, almost all gasoline engines operate rich of stoichiometric to keep temperatures (particularly of the exhaust valves and turbocharger turbine) in check.

A full-time workhorse truck is still best powered by Diesel.
 

thebigarniedog

Master of the Obvious
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Location
Fail Command (Central Ohio)
TDI
1998 Jetta tdi
Yes, the Ecoboost was a $1K upgrade in my 2011 F150 FX2.
People buy the F150's 3.5L V6 Ecoboost BiTurbo primarily for the low end torque which is quite a bit better than Ford's 5L V8. It's the F150's tow/haul engine, and is close as you can get to a diesel with similar low-end torque in a full size pick-up.
The mpg is respectable, but not as good as a diesel with equivalent low-end torque would be. But then, an equivalent diesel would probably be ~3-4K more expensive (Toaureg TDI for example). Which could take even longer to pay back.
The misnomer engine (ie the ecoboost 3.5) generally gets 1 mpg better then the 5.0. Power is about the same. The added complexity of the 3.5 undoubtedly will be trouble down the road for those choosing that route. What I am saying is that the 3.5 is a solution looking for a problem in the F150. What Ford should have done is utilized the smaller ecoboost engine (ie the 2.0, 4 cylinder turbo engine) from the explorer into the F150. The problem is of course ...... towing.
 

TDIMeister

Phd of TDIClub Enthusiast, Moderator at Large
Joined
May 1, 1999
Location
Canada
TDI
TDI
That's going in the more extreme direction of a solution in search of a problem. IMNSHO Chrysler has a better approach (for the specific case of a gasser truck engine if one must) of a V8 with cylinder deactivation. A normally-aspirated HEMI with direct injection, very high compression ratio and cylinder deactivation would be very good.
 

m1ketdi

Veteran Member
Joined
May 18, 2009
Location
Leam
TDI
Leon BKD
That's going in the more extreme direction of a solution in search of a problem. IMNSHO Chrysler has a better approach (for the specific case of a gasser truck engine if one must) of a V8 with cylinder deactivation. A normally-aspirated HEMI with direct injection, very high compression ratio and cylinder deactivation would be very good.
How much gain are chrysler getting with cylinder deactivation?
 

kjclow

Top Post Dawg
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Location
Charlotte, NC
TDI
2010 JSW TDI silver and black. 2017 Ram Ecodiesel dark red with brown and beige interior.
IIRC, they were saying a 10 - 15% increase in highway mpg. Doesn't sound like much until you consider going from 18 mpg to 20 mpg on a 30 gallon tank. If they would offer a diesel engine in the 1500/150 line, maybe they could get the highway mileage at least up to 25, maybe as high as 30? Imagine doing almost 1000 miles on a tank of fuel!
 

blaz

Veteran Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2006
Location
Ontario Canada
TDI
05 Passat
A full-time workhorse truck is still best powered by Diesel.
Sure. But they only exist in NA in the big truck categories (F250, F350), way more than most of us need. And way more expensive.
In the normal truck (F150) sizes, Ford's ecoboost provides more of the low end torque needed for hauling and towing than any V8, including the gas-guzzling 6.2L V8.
The misnomer engine (ie the ecoboost 3.5) generally gets 1 mpg better then the 5.0. Power is about the same.
"Power is about the same"? What most truck owners want is torque at the low end (<3000 rpm) where most of the work is done. Look at Ford's tow capacity and payload charts. The Ecoboost is always rated higher than the 5L V8.
Better, look at the torque curves. Here's Ford's comparison of the Ecoboost with competing engines: Ecoboost vs the world
and here's Ford's comparison of the new 5L V8 with competing engines:
5L V8 vs the world
THe Ecoboost has way more low-end torque than the 5L. And just for kicks, here's Ford's comparison of their 6.2L V8:
6.2L V8 vs the world
The Ecoboost matches or beats the torque of even the big V8s at lower rpms.
These are Ford's graphs so maybe take them with a grain of salt when looking at their competitors engines. But they should be good for comparing the Ford line-up.
Will the Ecoboost be reliable in the long run? Who knows, but it's no more complicated VW TDI's with direct injection and turbos. And although diesels are famous for high mileage, you sometimes have to spend a lot of money to get them there (Passat's Balance Shaft, CR hi pressure fuel pump).
The Ecoboost will never match a diesel in fuel efficiency. But it is available, and AFAIK it provides the best low-end torque for normal sized trucks.
 

thebigarniedog

Master of the Obvious
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Location
Fail Command (Central Ohio)
TDI
1998 Jetta tdi
Sure. But they only exist in NA in the big truck categories (F250, F350), way more than most of us need. And way more expensive.
In the normal truck (F150) sizes, Ford's ecoboost provides more of the low end torque needed for hauling and towing than any V8, including the gas-guzzling 6.2L V8.

"Power is about the same"? What most truck owners want is torque at the low end (<3000 rpm) where most of the work is done. Look at Ford's tow capacity and payload charts. The Ecoboost is always rated higher than the 5L V8.
Better, look at the torque curves. Here's Ford's comparison of the Ecoboost with competing engines: Ecoboost vs the world
and here's Ford's comparison of the new 5L V8 with competing engines:
5L V8 vs the world
THe Ecoboost has way more low-end torque than the 5L. And just for kicks, here's Ford's comparison of their 6.2L V8:
6.2L V8 vs the world
The Ecoboost matches or beats the torque of even the big V8s at lower rpms.
These are Ford's graphs so maybe take them with a grain of salt when looking at their competitors engines. But they should be good for comparing the Ford line-up.
Will the Ecoboost be reliable in the long run? Who knows, but it's no more complicated VW TDI's with direct injection and turbos. And although diesels are famous for high mileage, you sometimes have to spend a lot of money to get them there (Passat's Balance Shaft, CR hi pressure fuel pump).
The Ecoboost will never match a diesel in fuel efficiency. But it is available, and AFAIK it provides the best low-end torque for normal sized trucks.
Yet Ford does not offer the 3.5 in their Super Duty line ---- but does the 6.2. Why is that? Ford is the one that "titled" this engine (ie the 3.5) the "ecoboost". Essentially, this engine returns a whole 1 mpg more then the 5.0. I would invite you to check out Fuelly for some real world numbers on this engine vs the 5.0.

Without turning this into a debate on the the 3.5 vs. the world, some other issues:

1. The towing mpg for the 3.5 sucks;
2. Adding complexity for the sake of adding complexity in a Ford is not a good thing long term;
3. The consensus appears to be that the 3.5 is already tuned to it's max from the factory. Ford is aggressively screening this engine for aftermarket tunes. The 5.0 has upside tuning potential.
4. The difference in max tow is minor.
5. Ford's normally apsirated v6 gets better mpg then the 3.5.

The point of using the 2.0 ecoboost is to improve the mpg of a vehicle that is otherwise relegated to the mid teens over-all driving. It fails due to the lack of towing potential (Ford admits the same). Ford's calling their 3.5 engine "ecoboost" does not accomplish this goal, since the mpg sucks in everday driving and sucks harder when towing. My global point (walking through the gasser facts to get there) is that there is no substitute for a properly sized diesel --- to which has yet to occur in any pickup truck.

What is worse is that Ford (and others) have so spread out the price points on their pickup trucks, that they have no incentive to cut into their profits to get to that point where a 3.5L Tdi works (entry level 2wd f150 starts at $20(k); any 4wd f150 starts at $30(k); the upper price range of a F150 is north of $50(K), which amounts to mainly options and status; any diesel offering using an oversized diesel engine (F250 up) minimum price of $40(k)).

What most truck owners want is a good mix of power, towing, fuel efficiency and price. The market, as it exists now, does not offer such a beast. While one person may want to look at towing as the most important feature of a truck, others may pick price or fuel efficiency as the most important. Stated differently, there is probably not a real world application for a zero - sixty mph towing a 9000 pound sled as the sole determinative factor in buying a truck, especially when I see most f150s 4wd not even being used to tow. Just an opinion......
 

blaz

Veteran Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2006
Location
Ontario Canada
TDI
05 Passat
Yet Ford does not offer the 3.5 in their Super Duty line ---- but does the 6.2. Why is that?
For the extra heavy duty loads of the F250 and above, the 6.2L V8 or the diesel are proven and are more robust than the Ecoboost. They're certainly heavier with more cast iron. But obviously you pay for that capacity and robustness, initially and ongoing.
So Ford thinks the Ecoboost fits within the F150's lower tow/haul limits. What's the problem? It still has exceptional low-end torque.
Ford is the one that "titled" this engine (ie the 3.5) the "ecoboost". Essentially, this engine returns a whole 1 mpg more then the 5.0. I would invite you to check out Fuelly for some real world numbers on this engine vs the 5.0.
...
1. The towing mpg for the 3.5 sucks;
...
Ford's calling their 3.5 engine "ecoboost" does not accomplish this goal, since the mpg sucks in everday driving and sucks harder when towing.
...
I have an Ecoboost and carefully record my fuel mileage. Over ~6000km towing, I'm getting the same mileage as our previous truck, a Tacoma 4L V6. With a 5000# load (inc. upright TT), mileage is ~12.0 mpgUS. But with about twice the low-end torque of the Tacoma, our trips are much easier.
I rarely use it other than towing, but so far am getting 18.6 mpgUS "around town" and up to ~23mpgUS steady on the hwy.
But you can get a lot worse mileage if you stomp on it. The power reserves are there, and if you use them unnecessarily you will pay.
My global point (walking through the gasser facts to get there) is that there is no substitute for a properly sized diesel --- to which has yet to occur in any pickup truck.
Well, we can agree on that at least. I've repeatedly said that the Ecoboost's mileage will not match an equivalent diesel. But it does have similar low-end torque.
And since there's no diesel available for an F150 sized truck, and if you want that low-end torque, go for the Ecoboost. If you don't want all the low-end torque, do the 5L V8 or even go down to the 3.7L V6. Seems simple to me.
Not all of us are willing to wait (or pay) for the perfect diesel pickup.
 

blaz

Veteran Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2006
Location
Ontario Canada
TDI
05 Passat
Just noticed on the vw.uk site how different the mileage on the Euro Circuit is for the 2L I4 BiTDI in the Amarok, versus the V6 TDI (245PS) in the Touareg.

Amarok Touareg
Urban 9.7 8.5 L/100km
Hwy 7.0 6.6 L/100km

My explanation: The Touareg has the 8-spd auto, while the Amarok only a 6sp manual and a final gear ratio to allow it to tow/haul more. Maybe aerodynamics too? Both vehicles are off-road capable ...

But I was surprised. Generally expect worse mileage with more powerful engines, and didn't realize how much other factors can turn that on it's head.
 
Last edited:
Top