[ QUOTE ]
bbarbulo said:
I disagree with the complexity issue... I personally think cars have become 10X easier to diagnose since the carburated days... at least now the computer will give you an area to look into, rather than doing the ol' air/fuel/spark thing and having to fiddle with jets. True, though, that mechanics are usually grease monkeys who don't give a rat's ass and just wanna go home and drink beer and bang their floppy titty ex-stripper g/f. Gone are the days of the noble/knowledgable neighborhood mechanic. /images/graemlins/frown.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
You're right ... IF the mechanic in question has the correct diagnostic equipment AND has read the shop manual AND recognizes that faults displayed in the diagnostics don't necessarily point directly to the problem AND recognizes that not all faults show up in the diagnostics AND uses common sense and knowledge when things progress beyond the factory service procedures!
That's not always the case, though ... There's countless stories of cars being connected to the diagnostics in response to a complaint, but it's something the diagnostics cannot know about, so the mechanic says "nothing's wrong" ... Relay 109 is like this, for one example ... There's another problem with the diagnostic procedure for the glow plug system - the one that's been wrong in the shop manual for years ...
I, personally, am glad that my car does not have ABS, power sunroof, power seats, oxygen sensors, navigation system, automatic climate control, traction control, and a whole bunch more. Less crap to go wrong.