www.tdiclub.com

Economy - Longevity - Performance
The #1 Source of TDI Information on the Web!
Forums Articles Links Meets
Orders TDI Club Cards TDIFest 2016 Gone, but not forgotten VAG-Com List Unit Conversions TDIClub Chat Thank You




Go Back   TDIClub Forums > TDI Model Specific Discussions Areas > VW MKIV-A4 TDIs (VE and PD)

VW MKIV-A4 TDIs (VE and PD) This is a general discussion about A4/MkIV Jetta (99.5-~2005), Golf(99.5-2006), and New Beetle(98-2006). Both VE and PD engines are covered here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 20th, 2017, 02:12   #16
UhOh
Veteran Member
 
UhOh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: PNW
Default

These care are really highway cars. In my 02m (6spd) Golf I can be driving down the freeway knowing that there's almost no other vehicle around getting the MPG that I'm getting. In any of my manual trans cars when I hit the city I can watch the MPG plummet. I run UltraGauge on two of my cars (kids have them in their cars): I'm on backorder for one for my blue Golf (6spd). If I were doing city driving I'd be running a hybrid or an EV: right tool for the job; my toolset is currently only ALHs as my miles are almost all highway (all three of my Golfs are averaging over 50 mpg).

I'll have to state that the 01m cars aren't necessarily pigs. Had the daughter's car tuned (Stage 1) and with injectors/nozzles out of a manual trans car and that thing pulls extremely hard: had her "race" her brother in his Stage 3 5spd from a light and her wagon actually out-pulled his Golf- no real lag from shifting. Of course, he said that he really was on the throttle, but I don't now whether he was serious: but on the other hand I doubt that he'd want to concede to his sister! No idea what FE the wagon is getting: it's up in Canada where they use funny numbers (UltraGauge is mainly mean as a service tool for me- I'm notified whenever any codes pop up)
UhOh is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2017, 16:39   #17
dubStrom
Veteran Member
 
dubStrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Default above 40mpg city in the 03 ALH wagon 5MT

OK, the short block and 5sp manual transmission is from a Golf, same year, with about 190k behind it.

But now I see I can pretty easily push into the 40s in the city (some "beltway" driving). Last tank would have made 600 but I tanked up at 1/8th. Calculated over 44mpg. Hard to complain about that, especially with the slightly heavier tires and 16" wheels.

The '15 GSW is a totally different animal. Once in a while it hits a groove where it holds 60 or 65 on a moderate hill while maintaining 48mpg like my '14 JSW did. But the second you press down, even a little, PLUNGES into low thirties on the hills (yes, I am talking about the instantaneous readout). I need a tune to help with torque on hills. I think it will maintain better mpg under those conditions.
__________________
Lost my JSW to a reckless MB E350 sedan driver blowing a stoplight:
http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=472255
Working on a replacement project:
http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=472257
dubStrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2017, 18:11   #18
IndigoBlueWagon
TDIClub Enthusiast
Principal IDParts
Vendor
w/Business number
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South of Boston
Fuel Economy: 50/45/37
Default

I'm beginning to think I probably drive more efficiently than I realize, since I get pretty good FE in stop and go driving in my Wagon. I've been visiting repair shops lately at least one morning a week, which means driving a couple miles, stopping, re-starting, and doing it again for a couple hours. And we have a lot of traffic going to Cape Cod many evenings for my commute home. Despite this (and running A/C all the time) I'm seeing 46-48 MPG pretty consistently. If I took a highway trip at 75 MPH with the A/C on I'd probably see 52. 10% isn't that big a penalty.

I love using the Wagon for the real short trip driving just because it doesn't take a big MPG hit. My GSW would lose more. And the BMW? Yikes.
__________________
2002 Jetta wagon, 353K, RC3+; 1993 Mercedes-Benz 300D 2.5, 197K; 1997 Passat, 284K; '99.5 Golf, 255K; 2011 335d, 53K; 2015 Golf Sportwagen, 3K. Principal, http://www.idparts.com
Kid's cars: 2002 Golf TDI, 2002 Jetta TDI
IndigoBlueWagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2017, 12:01   #19
steve6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Mount Albert, ON
Default

Given its wife driven and auto.. I'd be worried that your intake is clogged really bad!
steve6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22nd, 2017, 23:50   #20
UhOh
Veteran Member
 
UhOh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: PNW
Default

^^^ Yeah. Got my car (2014) with 118k miles on it and the intake was clogged pretty bad. PO (of 12 years) was a woman.
UhOh is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
30/42 MPG Golf, 31/43 MPG Passat? Polak VW MKVI-A6 Golf family including Jetta SportWagen (~ 2010-2014) 10 June 19th, 2011 22:29
What is reasonable mpg for my TDI? tdisled TDI Fuel Economy 10 September 20th, 2009 19:34
I can't get more than 30 mpg Adman TDI Fuel Economy 13 May 6th, 2008 07:52
Reasonable MPG? damthrill TDI Fuel Economy 22 February 4th, 2008 14:56
Article about getting 50 mpg in a 30 MPG gasser dhdenney TDI Fuel Economy 18 December 6th, 2007 19:59


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 19:52.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright - TDIClub Online LTD - 2017
Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Forum Rules | Disclaimer
TDIClub Online Ltd (TDIClub.com) is not affiliated with the VWoA or VWAG and is supported by contributions from viewers like you.
1996 - 2017, All Rights Reserved
Page generated in 0.13372 seconds with 13 queries
[Output: 72.85 Kb. compressed to 64.74 Kb. by saving 8.12 Kb. (11.14%)]