First, let me be clear what I am talking about. I mean supplementation of the air mixture with hydrogen gas (H2).
I'm aware this topic is discouraged, and I do not want to debate about it. But is anyone aware of objective testing of these systems? Almost everything I find online is anecdotal or snake-oil. Is there any scientific testing of these systems? I'm sure supplementation with H2 would make combustion more energetic. The question is if this gain can offset the inherently wasteful process of H2 generation.
If there is a place which has tested these systems, and found them to be worthless, great. I'm just interested in seeing some solid information on this. I'm aware of all the theoretical sides of the debate, so let's not get into that discussion. Just links to places which have done real testing (if any do indeed exist). It might be that no one has tested it simply because it doesn't make scientific sense - just as nuclear regulators do not study "leukemia clusters" around nuclear power plants since they know it's total BS (no causality) and at best a mere coincidence. So if there is a respected source which does an in depth analysis of the potential of these systems, and finds them to be worthless and as such not worthy of further investigation, that would also be great.
I'm aware this topic is discouraged, and I do not want to debate about it. But is anyone aware of objective testing of these systems? Almost everything I find online is anecdotal or snake-oil. Is there any scientific testing of these systems? I'm sure supplementation with H2 would make combustion more energetic. The question is if this gain can offset the inherently wasteful process of H2 generation.
If there is a place which has tested these systems, and found them to be worthless, great. I'm just interested in seeing some solid information on this. I'm aware of all the theoretical sides of the debate, so let's not get into that discussion. Just links to places which have done real testing (if any do indeed exist). It might be that no one has tested it simply because it doesn't make scientific sense - just as nuclear regulators do not study "leukemia clusters" around nuclear power plants since they know it's total BS (no causality) and at best a mere coincidence. So if there is a respected source which does an in depth analysis of the potential of these systems, and finds them to be worthless and as such not worthy of further investigation, that would also be great.