Makes good sense.Having followed the HPFP situation from the start, and having worked in the auto manufacturing industry (but not for VW), here is my speculation to the situation.
The early failures probably received a lot of attention from both Bosch and VW sides. The design was obviously changed several times in 2008/2009/2010. When that didn't drastically cut down the failure rate the next step was to gather as much data from failures as possible. Was there contamination with RUG in failures? Sure! Ok, well maybe those failures where there wasn't immediately contamination evident were misfiled at some point earlier and it took a while to manifest. Let's eliminate that variable by installing the fuel guards.
Now that the fuel guards are in, and the failure rate isn't where it needs to be, there is probably renewed interest in what other causes can be identified and eliminated.
I would guess VW is pushing Bosch to fix this, and the RUG contamination argument isn't going to fly from now.
Pushing BOSCH???? Gone Surfing they better have PUSHED hard for the past few years and brought in all the changes needed for the new E288 engine or they will be in another 5-6 year hole. I hope pushing is over a long time ago. TDIs in a Golf 7 land late summer in Toronto and maybe earlier. Better not still be pushing cause cars are probably at the Train yard in Mexico ready to be shipped with that lovely TDI motor in it!Having followed the HPFP situation from the start, and having worked in the auto manufacturing industry (but not for VW), here is my speculation to the situation.
The early failures probably received a lot of attention from both Bosch and VW sides. The design was obviously changed several times in 2008/2009/2010. When that didn't drastically cut down the failure rate the next step was to gather as much data from failures as possible. Was there contamination with RUG in failures? Sure! Ok, well maybe those failures where there wasn't immediately contamination evident were misfiled at some point earlier and it took a while to manifest. Let's eliminate that variable by installing the fuel guards.
Now that the fuel guards are in, and the failure rate isn't where it needs to be, there is probably renewed interest in what other causes can be identified and eliminated.
I would guess VW is pushing Bosch to fix this, and the RUG contamination argument isn't going to fly from now.
Most often this is due to the engineering / accountant (and marketing) interface. Engineers only have so much say; however, I believe good companies trust their engineers more than their accountants.I agree that what gonesurfing stated makes sense.
However, what makes sense and what VWoA does in response to design issues don't always agree.
Theoretically, but not probable. Higher pressures are needed to meet the emission requirements in place today. The HPFP and SCR are the most cost effective means of getting there.Volkswagen just needs to go back to their original engines -- ALH or pump duse. The less moving parts, the less problems. The longer the line of cars (mustang, civic, corolla and camry) the better.
This won't happen. The older-design engines cannot conform to post-2007 emission standards. Neither P-D nor rotary-pump engines allow sufficient control of the injection and combustion process, and neither one is capable of doing what is needed to regenerate the DPF and NOx catalysts. Operating without the DPF and NOx catalysts is not even remotely capable of complying with today's emission standards - not even close - so that is a non-starter.Volkswagen just needs to go back to their original engines -- ALH or pump duse.
While I respect your opinion, I have to correct the train of thought, Since it all comes down to Dollars and Cents, the Accountants have the upper hand.Most often this is due to the engineering / accountant (and marketing) interface. Engineers only have so much say; however, I believe good companies trust their engineers more than their accountants.
Have you reported the failure on the specific thread on here and to the NHTSA?33,600 miles with no problems at all. Los Angeles to Lake Havasu, AZ Friday afternoon, 300 miles in 110 degree weather. Parked for 2 hours, drove to market. Glow plug light came on, engine stumbled, died, no restart. Walked to 2nd home. Next day - no start, called VW, towed 150 miles to Las Vegas, rented car in AZ for weekend and drive back to LA. LV VW dealer says "out of fuel". Reply "impossible, only drove 300 miles". On Monday, dealer calls to say it may take a week, it is the fuel pump and he is working on getting coverage for work from VW. Reply "still under warranty, why wouldn't VW cover". No answer. On Wednesday calls to say have to order parts, metal particles in the fuel system, may be longer.(Final count 11 days from failure to repair). With additional days on rental, out of state drop of fee, hotel room, etc. about $800 in outlay (not counting time to travel to Las Vegas to pick up car and back to LA). VW reimbursed $500 travel interruption. No mention of bad fuel from dealer, so VW must realize now that this is not the cause of the problem. Point is that the problem is not solved as of 2012 model.
I have not heard of any yet. We have apparently better quality fuel here.Bluey, is Australia also having problems with HPFP failure?
While that is one solution, I don't believe it will absolutely solve the problem. The reason I suggest the 2% Bio won't do it, because certain states already have 2-5 % Bio blended in the fuel already, yet those states are seeing failures as well.Easiest way to fix lubricity appears to be to add 2% biodiesel. Surely would be a simple "green" recommendation and fix for VWoA to line up a fuel company to produce/distribute this and recommend it for all TDIs.
[...]certain states already have 2-5 % Bio blended in the fuel already, yet those states are seeing failures as well.[....]
I thought the suggestion was 50% of HPFP failures were attributed to misfueling. So presume the other 50% are due to lubricity problems - fuel, water, contamination.
VWoA have not confirmed this. It might be 40% are due to misfueling, 40% are to lubricity/contamination, 20% are unknown (and this is the roulette wheel, you (hapless consumer we all are) don't get to choose how to mitigate against this failure.I thought the suggestion was 50% of HPFP failures were attributed to misfueling. So presume the other 50% are due to lubricity problems - fuel, water, contamination.
And in my case, as noted by my "signature block" below, mine failed, but the dealership covered everything, including a loaner for the week & a half to affect the full replacement. Anything fuel related was replaced. I should alert you the the service manager, at the time, knew full well that I had been using only Chevron fuel, and had kept every, that is every, receipt.Fm > NedCall
On Wednesday calls to say have to order parts, metal particles in the fuel system, may be longer.(Final count 11 days from failure to repair). With additional days on rental, out of state drop of fee, hotel room, etc. about $800 in outlay (not counting time to travel to Las Vegas to pick up car and back to LA). VW reimbursed $500 travel interruption. No mention of bad fuel from dealer, so VW must realize now that this is not the cause of the problem.
Whow, very good piece of information...Fm > Bluey
Bosch also makes a V6 Mercedes HPFP of steel, compared to the aluminum alloy for VW.
How is injector debris able to get into the pump? Is fuel from the rail able to get back to the pump without first going to the tank and back through the filtering system?Another reason lubricity doesn't seem to help is the pump is not always the source of the failure. I talked the instructor at VW and he relayed engineer findings that the Piezeo injectors were failing. The debris from the piezeo waffers get into the pump and chew it up.
This fits with what happened to one of our techs. He forgot to bleed a fuel system after replacing everything. He started it up, it burped and died, then wouldn't restart. Tech line told him that there was probably air in the injectors and he broke the waffers. Replaced the injectors again, clean out the lines, bleed the system this time. It started right up and has been fine since.
On that note the Passat (which has almost zero HPFP failure) and the new EA288 have solenoid injectors instead of piezeo.
Jason
Reported on two threads here that seem to be appropriate (not sure what the "correct" one might be). I'll check NHTSA website and report today.Have you reported the failure on the specific thread on here and to the NHTSA?