dieseldorf said:
2 year old M1 0W40 on left, 6 month old M1 0W40 on right
Comparing your UOA (the one on the right) with this VOA (
http://theoildrop.server101.com/cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=11;t=000347 ) or this one (
http://theoildrop.server101.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=11;t=000275 ) suggests to me that your oil change interval is just a bit too long.
1) VOA TBN was 12.6 (I've seen different but similar numbers, but let's assume it's close).
UOA TBN was 3.73. TBN isn't a crucial number for gassers, but your low number still indicates a lot of acidity in the oil.
2) VOA cP @100ºC = 11.014
Your UOA cP @100ºC = 12.62
Thickening is somewhat normal in a diesel oil in a diesel engine, as it absorbs soot. Why is this oil getting thicker?
3) The additive package has not degraded, when compared to the VOA. But it is the original additive package that was criticized. And the base oil, by some critics.
I'm thinking 8k miles is probably a safer OCI. I don't know whether the original (SL) version was better for a 10k OCI.
mparker326 said:
It sure looks like that "weaker" additive package performed quite well. This once again shows the folly of internet pundits trying to out guess the maker of an oil.
A pundit is defined as an expert in a particular field, who is called upon to offer advice to the public. I am not an expert, ergo I am not a pundit.