Ol'Rattler
Top Post Dawg
I think that would be some bad ju-ju. If you turned off regens, soot would continue to accumulate in the DPF and you could go easily beyond the point where a regen wouldn't be possible. I'll bet unplugging the exhaust butterfly valve and ASV might do the trick though.
I would agree that the idea of regens is some pretty boneheaded engineering that was inflicted upon us by the EPA. Does anyone have actual numbers on how much regens reduce emissions? I tried to correlate the emissions on my BRM as compared to the 2009 through the 2014 CR's and couldn't find any meaningful data. I think they just want us to keep drinking the "climate change" Kool-Aid.
NatGeo had a photograph of a Polar Bear dying of natural causes and the photographer attributed it's condition to "Climate Change". When NatGeo published a retraction, the photographer stated that what was photographed wasn't technically caused by climate change, but does represent what climate change can do. Really? People at the EPA with this mindset are apparently writing emission standard's legislation.
I would agree that the idea of regens is some pretty boneheaded engineering that was inflicted upon us by the EPA. Does anyone have actual numbers on how much regens reduce emissions? I tried to correlate the emissions on my BRM as compared to the 2009 through the 2014 CR's and couldn't find any meaningful data. I think they just want us to keep drinking the "climate change" Kool-Aid.
NatGeo had a photograph of a Polar Bear dying of natural causes and the photographer attributed it's condition to "Climate Change". When NatGeo published a retraction, the photographer stated that what was photographed wasn't technically caused by climate change, but does represent what climate change can do. Really? People at the EPA with this mindset are apparently writing emission standard's legislation.