MrMopar
Top Post Dawg
Federal Government to require rearview cameras in all new cars by 2014:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/02/28/regulators-to-require-rearview-cameras-in-all-new-cars-by-2014/
The next day they announced they are delaying those rules:
http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2012/02/29/rearview-video-camera-rules-delayed/
Text from the 1st article: In a draft paper, regulators said it would cost automakers between $160 and $200 to install the cameras and viewing screens in each new vehicle -- as much as $2.7 billion per year overall.
Can we PLEASE find a government regulator who can at least admit that it isn't going to cost the automakers a dime to install these cameras? IT WILL COST THE US CUSTOMERS $2.7 BILLION PER YEAR. I just can't stand government twits who act as if the customers of any product they regulate don't have to pay jack for what they are regulating . . .
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/02/28/regulators-to-require-rearview-cameras-in-all-new-cars-by-2014/
The next day they announced they are delaying those rules:
http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2012/02/29/rearview-video-camera-rules-delayed/
Text from the 1st article: In a draft paper, regulators said it would cost automakers between $160 and $200 to install the cameras and viewing screens in each new vehicle -- as much as $2.7 billion per year overall.
Can we PLEASE find a government regulator who can at least admit that it isn't going to cost the automakers a dime to install these cameras? IT WILL COST THE US CUSTOMERS $2.7 BILLION PER YEAR. I just can't stand government twits who act as if the customers of any product they regulate don't have to pay jack for what they are regulating . . .