Abacus, if the car suffers (knocks on wood) a failure in the future on the crank sprocket, please update the thread.
I replaced my crank pulley at the time of my timing belt change 50k ago, and it's coming around again. At the time, I replaced the crank seal, pulley and bolt. I got lucky with mine - there was no wear on the crank snout or the timing belt pulley. I plan on taking mine off again and replacing the bolt again when I re-do the belt in the spring.
I do recall mine having no perceptable rotational motion relative to the crank snout before I torqued it down. I would be hopeful but concerned to have only the crank bolt as the thing resisting torsional forces applied by the tension in the cam belt as well as the accessory belt system.
If this were my car, I would invest in a clutched alternator pulley to reduce the forces applied to the crank pulley by the rotational mass of the alternator.
I replaced my crank pulley at the time of my timing belt change 50k ago, and it's coming around again. At the time, I replaced the crank seal, pulley and bolt. I got lucky with mine - there was no wear on the crank snout or the timing belt pulley. I plan on taking mine off again and replacing the bolt again when I re-do the belt in the spring.
I do recall mine having no perceptable rotational motion relative to the crank snout before I torqued it down. I would be hopeful but concerned to have only the crank bolt as the thing resisting torsional forces applied by the tension in the cam belt as well as the accessory belt system.
If this were my car, I would invest in a clutched alternator pulley to reduce the forces applied to the crank pulley by the rotational mass of the alternator.
Last edited: